Quantcast The Virginia Informer
College Media Network

City threatens action if fraternities move off-campus

Steven Nelson | Editor in Chief

Last Updated:7/9/09 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1

[Click to enlarge]
As the Spring semester ends many fraternities occupying on-campus dormitory space are preparing not to return to campus housing. This has been caused in part by changes to Res Life policy that have increased fraternities' difficulty in filling campus units.

Williamsburg City Zoning Administrator Rodney Rhodes recently issued a letter to fraternities cautioning them not to establish themselves at locations in the City outside of the College. The Office of the President was copied on the letter, according to information sent to The Informer.

Mr. Rhodes wrote, "we have been informed that many of the fraternities at the College of William and Mary have chosen not to seek on campus housing for the 2009-2010 school year." The letter continued, "fraternities are not permitted uses [for residential buildings] in the City other than in the William and Mary District."

Fraternity locations outside of the college zone, wrote Mr. Rhodes, will "be subject to legal action for enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance." The letter has been interpreted by some students as a scare tactic by the City.

Former City Council candidate Matt Beato ('09) said that he "hope[s] Mr. Rhodes was just trying to enforce the law and not use an inappropriate scare tactic towards William and Mary students." Mr. Beato notes that there is no rule preventing members of the same fraternity from living in the same house, so long as they abide by other city regulations. He suspects this letter to address a "non issue."
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

A Greek

posted 5/02/09 @ 3:23 PM EST

Has anyone tried litigating the city on the grounds that barring fraternities from meeting off campus is a violation of their first amendment rights to peaceably assemble? This isn't even about meeting in public - this is about meeting in a private domicile. (Continued…)

senior

posted 5/09/09 @ 5:16 AM EST

Nobody has tried it because it is not necessary. The city couldn't possible sue a group of friends for meeting, or doing anything, at a house where other friends were legally living. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Comments made on The Virginia Informer Online will never be removed or edited because of the commenter's ideology or viewpoint. Comments that are gratuitously profane, that steer too far off topic or that are libelous, abusive or that resort to personal attacks, however, are subject to removal. Comments made on The Virginia Informer Online may be republished in The Virginia Informer's print edition, and may be edited for brevity or clarity.

In This Issue

Advertisement

Poll

Are you following the Informer on Twitter? http://twitter.com/VaInformer
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement